Critique | ‘Kunstkammer’
Lismore Castle Arts
22 March – 26 October 2025
The kunstkammer or wunderkammer, the ‘cabinet of curiosities’, is, by its very nature, ostentatious. It represents wealth and worldliness, a capacity to not only collect various rare treasures but to showcase them in a suitably resplendent setting. There is a vanity to such endeavours, as noted in Samuel Quiccheberg’s 1565 advice to Duke Albrecht V of Bavaria on assembling a “repository of artificial and marvelous things”: “We are not dividing up for philosophers, precisely in line with nature itself, all natural objects: rather, we are sorting out for princes, into certain uncomplicated orderings, objects that are mostly pleasant to observe.”1 The kunstkammer is intended not just to be shown, but to be shown off.

The current exhibition at Lismore Castle, owned by the Duke and Duchess of Devonshire, would thus seem to qualify on account of its prestigious lineage alone. Yet, rather than simply presenting family heirlooms, ‘Kunstkammer’ invites Robert O’Byrne to curate “a re-creation and a re-invention of the genre,” combining historical artefacts, everyday accoutrements, contemporary artworks and esoteric oddities – as per Gabriel Kaltemarckt’s 1587 definition, comprising paintings and sculptures, local and foreign rarities, and “antlers, horns, claws, feathers and other things belonging to strange and curious animals.”2
Two full-length pier mirrors are adorned with hand-painted scenes of grotesque creatures and protruding sculptural busts of cherubs. A sphere of snail shells cluster into an impenetrable, self-contained mass. Cabinets of sinuously carved hardwood open up to reveal bronze bowls, spilling over with angular shards of coloured glass. The exhibition display, which demarcates the gallery’s central space into a series of compartments and corridors, stages a number of such distinct tableaux, some more fantastical than others.

A particular novelty is The Prize Fight (c.1900) by William Hart & Sons, a whimsical construction that features stuffed squirrels engaged in a boxing match. The scenario, which begins with the rodents shaking hands and ends with one pugilist collapsed across the canvas, takes place over six sequential dioramas, resembling a comic strip. Like the best parts of a kunstkammer, it defies description or categorisation, with its very indefinability indicating only the idiosyncrasies of its makers and the unorthodox taste of its owner.
The pairing of a sculpture of the Cavendish Serpent – a recurring motif in the Devonshire family heraldry – with a standing lamp incorporating a taxidermied snake, makes for a tense encounter, as the two reptiles lock gazes, perpetually frozen in anticipation. Of the contemporary artworks, John Kindness’s pieces feel especially at home. His acrylic drawings of scenes from Greek mythology, delicately rendered on antique cotton breeches, feel suitably otherworldly: Circe (2012) portrays twinned, conjoined hybrids of a sailor in naval rig and his monstrous, tattooed, porcine alter-ego (the title alludes to the enchantress who turned Odysseus’s crew into pigs). The image is doubled, reversed, like a playing card, and, like the undergarments themselves, evinces a peculiarly old-fashioned salaciousness. Kindness repeats the trick with Scylla and Charybdis (2012) a pair of cast resin toilet seats rendered with stylised beasts, schematic figures and decorative flourishes. Odysseus had to chart a narrow passage between the two sea monsters, an adventure that idiomatically refers to choosing between two evils. There is a juxtaposition of the profound and the profane here that would likely have amused Quiccheberg’s patron – and his guests.

In spite of these exceptions, the presentation of other contemporary artworks is less considered. Pieces such as Alice Maher’s aforementioned agglomeration of snail shells, The Four Directions (2005), or Dorothy Cross’ eerily discomfiting Red Rest and Red Baby (both 2021) with their immaculately carved ears embedded in ‘pillows’ of red-veined marble, aren’t just strange; they have an inherent strangeness on their own terms. Both artists have a conceptual intent, referentiality, sensitivity to materials, and history of delving into notions of the body, metamorphosis, nature, memory and mythology that belies the inclusion of their works as mere ‘curiosities’.
Monster Chetwynd’s handmade, oversized moths, constructed from cardboard, paint and latex, have been an abiding presence in her sprawling installations and ecstatic performances, but, here, clinging onto the gallery walls and devoid of any curatorial context, they appear as facsimiles of outsider art. Similarly, it’s hard to know what Sarah Lucas’ suspended assemblages of stuffed tights, plastic buckets and lounge chairs are supposed to contribute, other than a general atmosphere of abject deflation.

Given that ‘Kunstkammer’ largely eschews an overall contextualisation of the collective works as well as written descriptions of the individual objects, the inference is that their selection is largely determined by taste, an intuitive affinity for the bizarre or unexpected. That’s not necessarily a complaint: historical wunderkammers have themselves revolved around the often-unarticulated preferences of their owners. Yet, as a ‘re-invention of the genre’, the exhibition feels tentative, even restrained. It is caught between its own Scylla and Charybdis, neither willing to commit to a more taxonomical display of its contents – a ‘making sense’ of the otherwise incommensurable – or to diving headlong into its eccentricities through an immersive, overwhelming, pell-mell profusion of artefacts. The straight path isn’t generally the most interesting one.
Chris Clarke is a critic and curator based between Cork and Vienna.
1 Mark A. Meadow and Bruce Robertson (Eds. and trans.), The First Treatise on Museums: Samuel Quiccheberg’s Inscriptiones 1565 (Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2013).
2 Gabriel Kaltemarckt, ‘How a Kunstkammer should be formed’ (1587) reproduced in Journal of the History of Collections, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 1–6.